10 classic albums that would be better if they were shorter, and how they should be shortened
Making great records greater, one edit at a time
Thereās no doubt about it ā the world has got longer. Soon weāll all be living to 100, TV dramas are now two-hour marathons, prime-time Saturday night talent shows seem to go on as long as Ben Hur, and you rarely find a movie clocking in below the old 100-minute limit any more. Numb bums all round.
This phenomenon is also noticeable in music, where the advent of the CD has meant single albums can be stretched way beyond the old 35-40 minute average to an hour or moreās listening, as unlike with vinyl, the sound quality doesnāt diminish as you put more music on the disc. I fear that this has given people a licence to indulge.
Whatās worse, thereās barely a mass-audience rock album out there that hasnāt been reissued as an āenhancedā or ādeluxeā edition with loads of studio out-takes, demo versions and other floor-sweepings tacked on, which only serve to dilute rather than add to the charms of great works of art. Yet economy of expression is an old, old friend of art, even if it is a woefully neglected one.
So may I suggest going the other way? How about reissuing some great albums in a āreduxā format, with the filler from the original sets taken out?
Hereās my suggestions for some judicious edits to universally acclaimed, but slightly overweight classics.
Guns N' Roses ā Appetite For Destruction
Iām not even going to attempt the impossible, wheat-from-chaff task of whittling down Use Your Illusion I and II to a single album, but what about slimming down the 53 minutes of this universally acknowledged belter to an even leaner, meaner fighting weight of 47? The quick, painless extraction of Anything Goes and Youāre Crazy from side two, and weāre there. See, didnāt hurt a bit, did it?
Metallica ā Metallica
The Black Album could surely be made a couple of shades more black if it didnāt tip over the hour mark, and was neatly clipped of a couple of destined-for-deluxe-reissue tracks from its running order. Donāt Tread On Me? OK, how about we just sidestep you altogether, so we donāt have to discuss your slightly questionable flag-happy sentiments? And while weāre there, we could surely keep snipping and dispense with Through The Never. Then if we simply draw things to a close before the serviceable but unmistakable thrash of Struggle Within, weāve got an album that is 20 per cent shorter, but, Iād argue, a good 10% greater.
Sign up below to get the latest from Classic Rock, plus exclusive special offers, direct to your inbox!
Def Leppard - Hysteria
Perhaps surprisingly for one of the great commercial hard rock albums, this one clocked in at 62 minutes on release. But if it really was a rock answer to Michael Jacksonās Thriller, as producer Mutt Lange suggested, with every track a potential single, then can we suggest that a couple end up as b-sides instead? Would you miss Donāt Shoot Shotgun if it was quietly omitted? Then could we perhaps end on the title track, lopping off Excitable and Love and Affection? I know, I know ā but weāre being cruel to be kind here, people.
The Stone Roses ā The Stone Roses
This debut album may be a timeless pearl of a record, but some of the flimsier, indier moments could surely go by the wayside to bring it back under the 45-minute mark. Would My Sugar Spun Sister be terribly offended if her song were left off the album? Sheās probably old enough to live with the disappointment. Donāt Stop might be a bit of an indulgence, but it works as a psychedelic confection, whereas Bye Bye Badman could definitely say farewell permanently without too many tears being shed.
Oasis ā Definitely Maybe
Itās not hard to cut the crap out of Gallagher & Coās debut, to reduce it from 52 minutes to a neat 45. The rinky-dink delights of Digsyās Dinner will surely not be missed, and then if we brutally cull Up In The Sky and Bring It On Down, youāve got a shorter, sweeter listen whose charms simply cannot be denied.
Rage Against The Machine ā Rage Against The Machine
Funny how bands that profess to adhere to the less-is-more ethos of punk still end up making records too long for their own good. Most of these songs are over five minutes long, but short of shaving a minute off each, would skipping over Fistful of Steel make us enemies of the revolution? Or pragmatic radicals with the peopleās best interests at heart?
REM ā Automatic For The People
This 1992 gem is one album that gets very close to flawless. But can I just suggest one small amendment? Cut out the slightly clunking Ignoreland from side two, and then we can flow nicely from Monty Got A Raw Deal to Star Me Kitten and absolute perfection is pretty much achieved, at a beautifully substantial yet never-outstaying-its-welcome 48 minutes in length. Thank you and good night.
Bob Dylan ā Blood On The Tracks
I bow to no one in my enduring love for Mr Zimmermanās 1975 classic, but when Lily Rosemary & The Jack of Hearts comes on, I often decide to put the kettle on. Then I realise Iām out of milk and pop out to get some, answer an urgent call of nature, put the washing out to dry and phone my mum to wish her happy birthday, and I get back to my stereo to find myself asking āYe Gods, is this song STILL not finished?ā
It starts off pleasantly enough, but then simply refuses to end. For that reason, itās out. Admittedly, the woozy, bucolic charms of Meet Me In The Morning now flow straight into the slow, wistful charms of If You See Her, Say Hello, which isnāt ideal sequencing, but now weāre down to a nine-track, 42-minute journey of pure quality, whoās complaining?
The Beatles ā Abbey Road
Even the Fabs werenāt averse to a bit of over-indulgence. Although Revolver (14 songs, 35 minutes) is a beacon of brevity and even Sergeant Pepper clocks in at only 39, Abbey Roadās 17 songs last a full 47 minutes. I wouldnāt want to touch the medley on side two, but could Maxwellās Silver Hammer meet a sticky end? Or can we live without Octopusās Gardenās cutesy charms and remove Ringoās sole composition? Thereās no room for sentiment where great art is concerned. Mr Octopus ā notice has been served ā please look for another dwelling.
Led Zeppelin ā Physical Graffiti
Rare is the double album that you couldnāt reduce to a sizeable single serving. But Physical Graffiti is so consistently great, it just about justifies the extra length. That said, just how much damage would be done to the package as a whole if we neatly chopped out the middle three or four tracks from the second half? Could we not lose the so-so blues rock of Night Flight followed by The Wanton Song and Boogie With Stuās good-time pub rock? Come on ā they're there on the Deluxe reissue, after all. Then we could move Kashmir further back in the set to balance it all out a bit. No? OK, Iāll get my coat.
Johnny is a regular contributor to Prog and Classic Rock magazines, both online and in print. Johnny is a highly experienced and versatile music writer whose tastes range from prog and hard rock to RānāB, funk, folk and blues. He has written about music professionally for 30 years, surviving the Britpop wars at the NME in the 90s (under the hard-to-shake teenage nickname Johnny Cigarettes) before branching out to newspapers such as The Guardian and The Independent and magazines such as Uncut, Record Collector and, of course, Prog and Classic Rock.